← Oklahoma Center for Spine & Pain Solutions in the Oklahoma directory
Practice information, source dates and updates
Physician identified by practice: Cheng-Lun Soo, MD (orthopedic spine care).
South Oklahoma City: 13700 S Western Ave., Suite 100 · 405-806-7246.
Contract: online controlled-substance contract A–J analyzed; separately listed 9-17-2026-named master PDF not yet text-verified.
Verification: current practice forms page public; actual signed terms not confirmed.
Practice or institutional source · Source review: 2026-10-10. This does not independently verify current board licensure.
Update this practice’s information · Submit the current agreement
Practice and patient submissions are reviewed before public use. Historical agreements and material corrections remain versioned. Evidence and corrections standard.
OKLAHOMA · FACILITY CONTRACT DOSSIER · VERSION CHECK REQUIRED
Oklahoma Center for Spine & Pain Solutions: controlled-substance agreement
Online new-patient intake version compared against Oklahoma law · Reviewed October 12, 2026
Two publicly linked contract sources — do not confuse versions
The practice currently lists an online New Patient Form containing sections A–J titled Controlled Substance Contract. Its official Patient Forms page ALSO links a separate Opioid & Controlled Medication Treatment Master Agreement PDF whose filename identifies 9-17-2026. The current separately listed PDF could not be reliably read during this review; its contents, revision history, and relationship to the online form therefore remain unverified. The table below analyzes only the text actually visible in the online form, not an assumed current operative master contract.
Record status: Original online intake contract publicly accessible; the clinic’s more recently labeled master agreement is linked but not yet text-extracted. No completed patient agreement or evidence of enforcement was collected. Some online paragraphs repeat with incomplete text; quoted limitations are noted rather than silently corrected.
Online controlled-substance contract: term-by-term comparison
Oklahoma baseline: 63 O.S. §2-309I establishes conditional opioid-agreement duties. 63 O.S. §2-101(38) defines expected agreement subjects. Permission to specify restrictions or termination consequences does not itself mandate the exact condition a clinic chooses.
| Online clause | Documented condition | Legal-source comparison | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program participation (A) | Online intake form says patient will participate in the practice’s pain-management program and authorize information exchange with other treating providers. | State definition of an agreement permits listing other treatment modes. Exact required program participation and unrestricted release are clinic conditions; treatment-specific obligations need review. | Clinic-selected treatment and disclosure terms |
| Single pharmacy / no early refills (B) | Patients are directed to use the same pharmacy unless approved; early refills are disallowed with stated no-exception language. | State statute identifies refill and other-prescriber limitations as agreement subjects. It does not prescribe this universal no-exception language. | Clinic-selected restrictions within statutory subject |
| Outside controlled medications (C) | Patients agree not to seek or fill any controlled medication from another provider without advance written authorization; the online wording also ties refills to appointments. | State definition concerns restrictions on opioid prescriptions from other practitioners; the ‘any controlled medication’ scope and specific scheduling conditions are clinic language. | Broader than statutory subject specification |
| Records authorization (D) | The online intake form requires an unrestricted and current medical-records release, but the displayed paragraph visibly ends mid-sentence. | The text is incomplete; HIPAA validity and scope cannot be determined from this partial clause. | Unclear; legal/privacy review |
| Testing at every appointment or discretion (E) | Urine/blood testing, prescription-monitoring checks and pill counts are described at every visit or at provider discretion; patient agrees to cover costs insurance does not. | State definition authorizes specimen tests and pill counts as monitoring subjects. Universal every-visit frequency and uncovered charges are not dictated by that definition. | Recognized monitoring subject + clinic cadence/payment |
| Marijuana and law-enforcement sharing (F) | Form states marijuana without a valid Oklahoma medical card will cause immediate termination; asks patient to authorize information sharing/cooperation in investigations. | Agreement law permits defining consequences but does not itself mandate an automatic marijuana-based termination. Other controlled-substance, privacy, and medical-marijuana laws need separate review. | Clinic consequence; unresolved privacy/legal scope |
| Lost/stolen/damaged medication (G) | No replacement under stated no-exceptions language. | 2024 Oklahoma clinical guidelines generally discourage opioid replacements; a blanket no-exceptions requirement is not prescribed by the agreement statute. | Clinic rule aligned with nonbinding guidance |
| 72-hour driving restriction (H) | Patient agrees not to drive or operate dangerous equipment for 72 hours following any medication-dose change and when drowsy. | Driving while impaired is a separate safety/legal matter; the reviewed agreement statute does not impose a 72-hour statewide waiting period. | Clinic-specific restriction |
| Missed visits / ongoing eligibility (I) | Regular appointments are required to continue receiving controlled medications. | State chronic-pain law requires periodic assessment and monitoring, but not one uniform in-person visit schedule for every patient. | Clinic scheduling policy |
| Arrest and broad termination (J) | Form says arrest for DUI may make the patient ineligible for care and that violation of any term may lead to immediate termination; it reserves discretionary termination. | State definition requires outlining termination processes, not a mandatory sanction for arrest. The operative termination procedure and continuity-of-care obligations must be checked against clinician licensing rules and actual facts. | Clinic consequence; legal review required |
Unresolved legal and version questions
Review the current 9-17-2026-labeled master PDF before attributing any online intake condition to the operative 2026 policy. The broad privacy release and immediate-termination language require separate counsel review of medical privacy, licensing/continuity obligations, informed consent, and actual circumstances. The Osteopathic Board termination policy is applicable to that board’s licensees, not automatically to this MD-associated practice. This page does not establish a violation of that policy or any other law.
Primary sources and verification
Online clinic intake form, Controlled Substance Contract A–J · Practice forms listing · Separately linked 2026-named master agreement · 63 O.S. §2-101(38) · 63 O.S. §2-309I · 2024 OSDH guideline · SB 1642, effective November 1, 2026.
Right of correction: The practice can provide a revision-dated copy or document a correction through Verify Your Pain Practice. Publication describes documents and limits, not the presumed motives or care of an individual practitioner.