No Right to Medicine
You Have No Right to Medicine…
What You Are Actually Entitled To and Why That Matters More
We need to begin with a hard truth, because any movement built on a false entitlement collapses the moment it is challenged.
You do not have a right to comfort.
You do not have a right to approval.
You do not have a right to medicine.
You do not have a right to a doctor.
You do not have a right to good health.
You do not have a right to be spared ridicule.
You do not have a right to afford any of the above either.
What you have is the Right to not be harmed if you are not harming another and are not about to. Outside instances of defense and recompense the Right of The Harmless is what entitles you to be doing what you are.
None of the rights listed above as not being so exist because of that which took place between the years 1913 and 1937… But we will get to that.
They were not American Rights. They are all things the government has claimed since the New Deal. They assumed authority over our lives in exchange for those things or in the promise of. They have forced people to have to ask themselves which they would rather have.
To have to decide. Which do you want. To not be manipulated through the law or those things listed above. You can indeed eat cake but there will be nothing left if you do. History proves that.
Insisting that they are entitlements has weakened every serious argument made on behalf of liberty over the last century. Now I know what I just said probably makes some of you angry but I am preparing you to defend yourself and if you can be bought they will buy you.
Understanding everything above is paramount.
This matters, because when you argue for things you are not entitled to, you invite authority to correct you. You frame yourself as a petitioner, not an unmovable object but something that can be moved. You trade sovereignty for sympathy or affordability and privileges none of which adds legal weight to your cause. All of which serves those who do not need a justification to not change.
So if there is no right to medicine, no right to health, and no right to comfort, then what protects your pursuit of health at all?
The answer is older, narrower, and far more dangerous to power and I am very happy to explain it.
The Right of the Harmless
Your inheritance is not the right to be healed.
It is the right of the harmless to not be harmed.
The right of the meek to not be violated.
The right of the non violent individual… to not be manipulated through fear, threat, or coercion.
If you are not harming another person, not preparing to harm another person, and have not already done so, then you possess a right as a single human being to be left free from imposed injury… physical or psychological… by anyone.
That is the right. It secures all justifiable liberties. No one is entitled to anything that contradicts the Right of the Harmless man to not be Harmed.
Everything else is based on want, fear, or greed AND not nature nor it’s God. We were created for our own sake. Not a God’s nor our neighbors.
When a government limits our healthcare options through law not by denying us a benefit, but by threatening you, your doctor, or your access… it is no longer neutral. It is no longer protective.
It has crossed from governance into ownership and free people own themselves.
And coercion applied to the harmless is the only universal civil rights violation.
1937 Was Not About Medicine
It Was About control and ownership of the people in the United States.
This did not begin with healthcare. Healthcare is merely where the contradiction became visible for us.
The turning point was 1937, during the American Revolution that is rarely taught AND never talked about.
That was the year the Supreme Court stopped resisting the New Deal and instead reinterpreted the Constitution to permit what it had previously… and correctly… found unconstitutional.
From that moment forward, the Constitution was no longer a restraint on power. It became a flexible document whose meaning could be adjusted to suit administrative necessity.
This is when “it depends on what the definition of is is” entered American governance… not as a joke, but as a doctrine.
Progressive era leaders did not argue that limits no longer existed.
They argued that limits were contextual.
And contextual rights are not rights at all but baited snares.
Why Anger Is Useful to Power
If you are in pain and angry, you are easy to dismiss and lead around by your emotions. Like a leashed animal. Lion or Dog.
Pain can be medicalized.
Anger can be pathologized.
Both can be used to strip you of credibility.
That is why triggering stories are fed into your news cycle. Not to inform you… but to destabilize you… Rob you of credibility and to create an opportunity to dismiss you entirely.
An emotionally flooded population does not resist authority; it begs for relief. And relief is always offered conditionally.
This is why emotional control is not self-help… it is strategy.
Stoicism Is Not Therapy
It Is Armor
Stoic philosophy is not about suppressing pain. It is about refusing to let pain make you manipulable.
A drowning man thrashes.
A coast guard enters the water deliberately.
The difference is not strength.
It is how they enter the water.
When you are hard to emotionally manipulate, you regain options. When you regain options, coercion loses its leverage.
That is why this is not a medical fight.
It is not a political fight.
It is not even a legal fight yet.
It is a fight over who who owns us.
The Only Fight That Matters
You cannot prune what has a taproot without it growing thicker over time.
You cannot reform what feeds on contradiction AS rights do not contradict…
You cannot vote away a philosophy that treats rights as conditional…
If you address symptoms, you help it grow…
The taproot must be cut.
And that root is the idea that the state may harm or threaten the harmless “for their own good.”
Once that premise is rejected, everything built on it collapses naturally.
That is the work.
This is the next article from the Start Here page.
2 Comments