California · Contract for Care
UC Davis Health — Pain Management Clinic — Facility Record
Sacramento · Agreement needed
| Service | Academic health-system pain service |
|---|---|
| Published address | 4860 Y Street, Third Floor, Sacramento, CA 95817 |
| Published phone | 916-734-7246 |
| Location source | Practice or health-system page |
| Checked | October 13, 2026 |
Contract and policy evidence
Agreement needed. No usable current agreement was reviewed for this location. This is a research gap, not a finding that the practice has no agreement.
State requirement or office condition?
California’s general Medical Board guidance recommends agreements; it does not mandate every office clause. Compare legal duties, recommendations and added conditions. The clinician, setting and payer matter. A reviewed public document does not prove current application to an individual patient.
Before an appointment
Confirm address, service scope, referral requirements, insurance, costs and current availability. A pain-service listing does not promise opioid prescribing or acceptance of new patients. Ask for the current agreement, exceptions and continuity-of-care process.
Evidence limits: A public document does not confirm current signed use. “Office condition” identifies wording or implementation not established as an exact requirement by the authorities reviewed. It does not decide legality, enforceability or clinical necessity. Clinician profession, payer, treatment setting and other laws may change the analysis. Checked October 13, 2026.
California facility directory · State requirements and guidance · Evidence library · Method and coverage · California Pain Atlas
Our Legal Case presents Seeds of Vice’s broader legal argument. Listing a practice or reviewing its document is not a court finding about that practice.
CONTRACT FOR CARE · RIGHTS, CONSENT & GOVERNMENT POWER
Our Legal Case
A patient’s need for medicine should not become the pressure used to obtain a criminal admission. Examine compulsory disclosures, penalties for silence, coerced rights waivers, and the circumstances behind the signature.
Use this state record to trace the legal requirement, then compare it with the terms an office adds. The full work explains the constitutional case, consent analysis, evidence needed, and protections to demand.
Apply the constitutional and consent review to this record
- Government responsibility: Which law, binding rule, agency instruction, or public-provider policy requires the particular disclosure or consequence? Separate it from provider-added terms.
- Potential criminal admission: Identify the exact spoken answer, written history, certification, or explanation and the real criminal risk it creates.
- Penalty for silence: Record what happens if the patient invokes the privilege or refuses a rights waiver, including denial, discharge, or interruption of treatment.
- Consent and pressure: Preserve the circumstances of signing, severity of pain, accessible alternatives, and whether the patient could honestly accept the prospective obligations.
- Criminal-use protection: Identify legally sufficient immunity and limits on use of both the answer and evidence derived from it. A privacy assurance is a separate protection.
Read the precedents, evidence framework, clause review, and remedies and reform demands. The work develops a proposed constitutional challenge; applying it to a particular condition requires its facts and legal authority.